The Paris Winter is Imogen Robertson's latest historical novel. Find it here on Amazon, where if you scroll down you will find my five star review. As you can see I was mightily impressed and couldn't wait to ask her if I could interview her. Fortunately, she did and what follows is our 'virtual' conversation.
SZ. What was your starting point for The Paris Winter? Was it the flooding in the city that winter or did that only come to light during your research. It fit the action seamlessly.
IR. Thank you! I think most writers would agree the world if full of starting points for stories, the difficulty is choosing which ones to pursue Paris Winter had a sort of dual beginning. I spent the Christmas of 2009 / 10 in my home town of Darlington and while I was there I went through some photo albums from my father's side of the family. My grandmother, Rona Tompkins, was born in 1892 and travelled through Europe on her own as a teenager. Among the photo albums of her having fun with friends in Vienna there were also some of her sketchbooks. The idea of Maud started there. Then in January I saw an article online which mentioned the Paris floods of 1910. The novel started to come alive in my mind then. I thought about a middle-class English girl in Paris, caught up in some situation that would be reflected by the city sinking and collapsing around her.
Some other important elements only came to light as I began my research. I was looking through old copies of the Times for their reports of the flood when I came across an appeal for funds for the Ada Leigh Homes for English Women in Paris. Miss Harris draws very directly on the accounts I found as a result of Ada Leigh and the women she cared for.
SZ. Tell us about Maud Heighton, the novel's main character. Even though I knew she was fictional, I found her so realistic, I had to look her up on Google! Was she based on anyone in history or was she totally made up?
No, she's not based on a particular historical character. I suppose she's a composite of my grandmothers and great-aunts. For her training and compulsion to draw and paint I talked a great deal to artists Caroline de Peyrecave and Claire Zakiewicz. Caroline had the same training Maud would have received in Paris, and Claire is an old friend as well as being a professional artist. One of the great things about being a writer is getting to ask people personal questions! I also read Laura Knight's autobiography and all sorts of works by and about the women artists of the time. There's probably a fair amount of me in Maud too. The interesting thing is when a character comes alive as you write, they become completely themselves and it's very difficult to pick apart where they came from.
SZ. Did many female artists work or learn in Paris at the time?
IR. Yes, they did indeed! Women weren't admitted to the Academie des Beaux Arts until 1897 but a number of private studios admitted women and continued to do so after that date. Some classes were mixed, others were single sex (as in the book). The most famous private school was Académie Julian, but the Académie Colarossi was also highly respected. There were guide books specifically written for women who wanted to study art in Paris, and articles in women's magazines for those thinking about taking the plunge. I think we underestimate our grandmothers and great-grandmothers sometimes. Women came from all over Europe and America to study though some, like Suzanne Valadon, were Parisian born and bred. Many female artists had works selected for the official and unofficial Paris Salons and deserve to be better known today than they are. Some greats are Mary Cassatt, Berthe Morisot and Hanna Hirsch-Pauli from the earlier part of the Belle Epoque; Sonia Delaunay, Valadon and Gwen John from closer to Maud's time.
SZ. My next favourite character is Tanya, a Russian heiress. I love the way that although she has a kind heart, because she lives a life of great opulence, she has no real idea of what it is to be poor although she tries. As I read the novel I realised that within four years, the Russian Revolution will change everything for her and her family. Were you aware of the fragility of her golden life as you wrote about her?
IR. Very much so. I studied Russian at University and Tanya is a result of my complicated love affair with that country. Many rich Russians spent time in Paris spending a great deal of money, and I suspect many of them didn't think the good times would ever end. Looking back a few years you have to admit we aren't very different now. I think Tanya is a survivor though, and her good heart will help her through the difficult times to come.
SZ. Your previous novels are historical crime fiction. The Paris Winter is about crime but I would not describe it as crime fiction. It's about much more than that.
IR. So often I think I find out what a book is about late in the editing process! I thought of Paris Winter as a sort of 'inside-out' crime novel when I was writing it. The challenge was to make the hero of the story not the detective, but the victim. That created a very different structure and allowed the book to find its own tone and themes.
SZ. Your previous novels were set in the 18th century and part of a series. Is The Paris Winter (set in the winter of 1909/10) a completely new departure or will you return to an earlier time in future novels?
IR. I'm writing the next in the Westerman and Crowther series at the moment. The great thing about writing a series is it gives your characters a lot of room to develop over time. I also love the narrative drive of the traditional crime novel, and it gives me the chance to explore all sorts of issues, situations and characters. I hope very much to carry on writing about Westerman and Crowther, but I will always want to break away from time to time and do something fresh as well.
SZ. I love the way that although you must have done a lot of detailed research, none of it felt like research. The effects of being addicted to opium were so real.
IR.I love doing the research. It's a wonderful time when you discover all sorts of scraps and colours. With the opium, there are some great accounts of addiction, Jean Cocteau's of course being one. The one which of most use to me though was published while I was editing, Steven Martin's Opium Fiend. It is a brilliant, moving and absolutely terrifying account of opium addiction and he describes smoking opium using the same method and kit as were used in Paris at the time. It saved me from repeating many mistakes from other, less reliable accounts. I really recommend it.
SZ. I see that some reviews weren't keen on the catalogue descriptions of the Maud's paintings and sketches. But I loved them even though we don't learn of their significance until much later. They added another layer of authenticity. When did this idea occur to you?
IR. For a long time I thought there was going to be a modern narrative running alongside Maud's story. Seems incredible now and I'm glad I abandoned it, but there you go. In that modern narrative Maud's paintings provided hints of what had happened to her. When I took (tore) out that modern storyline though, the pictures remained. I wanted the reader to pause occasionally as they read, and let a different voice and tone into what is, I hope, quite a dark and intense read at times. I do that in my Westerman and Crowther novels by swapping between narrative lines, here I held on to the paintings.
I always try to plan my novels carefully, and then end up writing something very different to what I imagined. I think that's inevitable really. Once the characters are on the page they start taking the story in new directions. That said I need some sort of plan or I would feel totally lost. It reminds me of something we used to say when I was working in film and TV. There is the film you write, the film you shoot and the film you edit and they are all different. Same thing with novels. You are always mapping out the territory as you go.
SZ. Thank you Imogen. The Paris Winter is published by Headline Review and is available in all bookshops and on-line now. I thoroughly recommend it.